Referring back to Katy’s blog on the city’s proposal to require a film permit and a $1 million liability insurance package for any “group of two or more people who want to use a camera in a single public location for more than half an hourâ€? or “any group of five or more people who plan to use a tripod in a public location for more than 10 minutes, including the time it takes to set up the equipment”, a rally is scheduled today (Friday July 27, at 6:30pm) to protest these rules in Union Square.

The full list of regulation can be found here: http://www.nyc.gov/html/film/downloads/pdf/moftb_permit_regs.pdf

These proposed regulations may have serious consequences to independent film makers and impede on our First Amendment rights.  We can stop these absurd proposed regulations from becoming law if legislation meets enough public outcry. 

Join the film/photo contingent in the festive (un-permitted) Union Square First Amendment Rally, this Friday July 27, at 6:30pm.  More info here: http://www.pictureny.org/?p=9

-Marko Vujovic

read more

Outreach and Distribution are the constant themes throughout the year here at Arts Engine. Everything we do revolves around using film to foster social action and getting good films to new and unexpected audiences. Summertime is a season where…

read more

On Monday CNN and YouTube partnered to present a new twist on the presidential debates.  YouTube sent out a call for entries, inviting anyone and everyone to submit a video question for the democratic candidates.  We put together a video…

read more

The New York Times ran an intelligent article today about Animal Welfare. The article focuses on Farm Sanctuary, an organization that was featured in a film also called Farm Sanctuary from this year’s Media That Matters Film Festival. 

What I most appreciate about the article is its exploration of the gap between Animal Rights activists and people who are advocating more humane treatment of animals in order to respond to the growing market for humanely raised animal products.  As the article explains, activists are beginning to explore a more moderate approach: “Mr. Pacelle [head of the Humane Society] understands that not everyone is going to stop eating animals, so he focuses on what he calls the three R’s: refinement of farming techniques, reducing meat consumption and replacement of animal products. That way, he hopes, the Humane Society tent is big enough to include both ardent meat eaters and hard-core vegans.” 

From my point of view, this approach to addressing the problem piecemeal, changing practices slowly rather than holding out for a wholesale conversion by American consumers, seems the one most likely to have a significant effect in the long run, and of course if we eliminate half of the animal suffering caused by our consumption practices, that’s good news for half the animals, which is a lot!  The article also introduces the perspective that animal welfare is getting more attention, “because American gastronomic consumers increasingly want to do right by the animals they eat.”  Even many who eat meat and don’t feel philosophically conflicted about it, still want to minimize the suffering of the animals that provide their food, and they are willing to pay the increased cost.  As one animal rights activist says in the article, “We’re not really in philosophical alignment, but I like to think we’re in strategic alliance.â€?

read more