engine feed: the arts engine staff blog
Log in [?]

December 2007

The entries below are not necessarily representative of the views of MediaRights, a project of Arts Engine, Inc.

Politics as usual?

Enrico

Obama takes Bollywood… chori chori. Maybe the 2008 elections will be this fantastic! We can only hope.

Comments

Share Your Thoughts

Please log in to leave a comment.

Persepolis - This Holiday Season

Laimah

persepolis.jpeg

Persepolis, a Sony Pictures Classic, opens in NYC on Christmas Day.

I had the great fortune of pre-screening Persepolis last night at the Regal Union Square Theater. Persepolis is based on autobiographical graphic novels by Marjane Satrapi, Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood and Persepolis 2: The Story of a Return. Satrapi recounts or illustrates her youth in Iran during the Islamic Revolution and her coming of age in the West.

The film is true to the books on many levels. The animation doesn’t stray from the comic book style of the graphic novels. Most of the key scenes from the two books are there, making it a longer length feature. And the stories are just as poignant, although the novels naturally leave more to the imagination.

To learn more and watch the trailer visit the film’s official website: www.sonypictures.com/classics/persepolis

Comments

Share Your Thoughts

Please log in to leave a comment.

The Doc Shortlist Drama

Angela

Recently, the shortlist for Best Documentary Oscar nominations were announced and there were many people with some strong feelings about it.

AJ Schnack, whose film, Kurt Cobain About A Son qualified under the Academy’s rules but was not selected, wrote a lengthy article. This point was particularly interesting:

Should we prefer a competent, conventionally styled film to one that swings for the fences, one whose highs hit us in unexpected ways, even if it occasionally falters in its risk-taking? The Academy and the IDA have chosen to stand on the side of conventional and competent.
Even more importantly, should we favor a film’s message over its craft? Here again, both the Academy and the IDA have answered resoundingly. Craft always comes in last.

Tricia Regan, whose film, Autism: The Musical, was on the shortlist this year, had this to say:

It truly is an honor just to be short-listed. And I agree, there are many great docs out there that did not make the short list, but they have been well recognized in other arenas, picking up awards all along the way. There is so much luck in all of this, but in the end, there are a lot of great docs, so getting into Sundance, winning an award, getting short-listed or nominated or even winning an Oscar, comes down to the individuals doing the voting and their particular tastes, and whatever politics exist within that voting structure.

Many other people are talking about this.

I looked at the shortlist and had not heard of many of these films. (And I am someone who sees a decent amount of docs.) I was disappointed that The King of Kong, my absolute favorite movie of this year, was not on this list. I have a hard time believing that all of these films are better. (Yes I know this list is subjective.) And I do believe that the storyline of the film — a battle to be the greatest Donkey Kong player in the world — stopped it from being selected. You can’t nominate a film like that for the Academy Award. Well, I think you can but the “powers that be” obviously disagree.

Thank goodness the qualification requirements have changed for next year. Eliminating the multiple-city rollout will create a bit more of a level playing field. I am not naive enough to believe that this process will magically become fair but it will be better. Too much of this has to do with the quality of your publicity or the size of your marketing budget. I wish more of it had to do with the quality of your film.

Comments

Share Your Thoughts

Please log in to leave a comment.

Mujeres en el Cine y la Televisión Conference

Jennifer

Last Thursday I flew down to Mexico City for the fourth annual Mujeres en el Cine y la Televisión (Women in Film and Television) Conference in Mexico. Throughout my time there, I noticed a general flourishing of new art and culture that emerged from traditional means. The terminal I arrived in at the airport, for example, was actually built fairly recently and as such was evident of modern trends in interior design. Another thing I noticed was the proliferation of graffiti as art. It seemed like every blank wall was an invitation for a Diego Rivera in the making to create an urban mural. Further adding to that notion of modern artists playing with traditional forms is the reason why I was invited to attend in the first place.

The conference, made up of both panels and film screenings, included a series of panel discussions entitled “Film and TV in the Age of Convergence: A Vision for the 21st Century.” I was invited to present at the panel called “Production, Distribution, and Exhibition: the Independent Experience.” As you can imagine, I was most interested in explaining to the audience how they can reach wider audiences and truly engage their audiences by using the internet and promoting their films in a slightly different way. To emphasize the power of this, I screened fourth annual Media That Matters Film Festival selection Novela, Novela. I chose this film because it discusses a group in Nicaragua that uses the traditional format of the Spanish language telenovela (soap opera) to openly discuss issues of domestic violence and abuse. In essence, they have taken an established form and by changing one element have made something new and interesting. When it comes to new means of distribution, I believe that just being open to trying something new is key. I often liken it to computer programming because it is definitely a lot of trial and error (though not nearly as complicated!) when it comes to figuring out how to best distribute your film on the web.

Directly following the panel I was on was one made up primarily of educators in film and media. Though the topic of the panel was new media literacy, many of the educators that worked in film schools in Mexico were very much against new media. One of the panel participants said something along the lines of “HD is very nice, but ultimately I want my film in 35mm.” This really surprised me! After the panel I spoke to several attendees who were not surprised and commented that those ideas are very common among the academic community there. María Novaro, filmmaker and fellow panelist, appealed for embracing digital media. Her rationale is based on cost — it is far more affordable to make a movie digitally than it is to make one on 35mm. I’m sure this debate will rage on, but it reminds me of a conversation I had with Shira regarding her recent digital camera purchase. We agreed that sometimes it isn’t the camera that makes a good image but the person behind the camera.

Wandering around in Coyoacán.

After my panel was over, I was able to soak up a little local culture. I visited La Casa Azul (The Blue House) which is now the Museo Frida Kahlo (Frida Kahlo Museum) in Coyoacán. It is the exact house where Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera once lived. Lucky for me, there was a new exhibit of her sketches and doodles. I also got a chance to do some shopping at a local bazaar where I was able to find a few things to bring back to family and friends.

Comments

Share Your Thoughts

Please log in to leave a comment.

As Many Bites as Necessary

Kasmore

In the New York Times piece Is the Entree Heading for Extinction? celebrity chef Tom Colicchio says, “Eating an entree is too many bites of one thing, and it’s boring.”

The article continues, “That’s in part why he moved away from the classic appetizer-entree-dessert rhythm of Gramercy Tavern when he opened Craft in 2001, one of the first prominent restaurants in New York to deconstruct the menu into a long list of proteins, side dishes and sauces to be mixed and matched into a family-style meal.”

I wonder if this same idea, that “too many bites of one thing being boring,” is also influencing the current trend in documentary film?

Recent movies like Magnetic Baby, Four-Eyed Monster and the current release of Nimrod Nation eschew the singular storyline in favor of a more episodic or deconstructed narrative; one that presents a succession of related side stories and minor characters to collectively express the subject of the film.

Is this format gaining popularity with documentary films because it better corresponds to our shortening attention span or is it simply an expression of form adapting to technological changes analogous to how audio technology has revolutionized popular music.

As Shira Golding notes in her Upstream report, Magnetic Baby, the “Video Podcast Docu-Series” one of the advantages of producing an episodic or fragmented narrative is that short self-contained stories can be easily viewed, distributed and digested as a vodcast.

Although I enjoy watching new documentaries via video-sharing networks like YouTube and VodCasts and I appreciate the aesthetic of presenting a story in a variety of “bite size” bits I hope that this new trend is not portent to the end of the “main course” structured narratives.

I’ve always found that there is a unique pleasure in giving yourself to the richness of a hearty and complex creation; where one subject is allowed your undivided attention and given ample time to reveal itself and its many different and subtle flavors. Just as Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon is best enjoyed in full, the complete album being greater than its parts, there are documentaries, like Koyaanisqatsi, Portrait of Jason and Salesman that are best served in long-form and digested in as many bites as necessary.

Comments

Excellent post.

Having eaten at both Craft and Gramercy Tavern multiple times, I have to say that bite sized bits may be amusing to the bouche but not particularly satisfying.

Posted on December 21, 2007 2:56 AM by Jacob Park

mm, hors d’oeuvres will tease those taste buds, but give yourself a large porkbelly full of tooth chomping, gritty, subject matter and youll never have enough..

Posted on December 21, 2007 7:21 AM by tara mooney

I gotta see Koyaanisqatsi!

Posted on December 21, 2007 1:43 PM by Angela Tucker

i like your examples, and i think you may be missing blogs on your bites list. ;) different moods call for different forms, and while sometimes you may want to sit down for a couple of hours with something rich and full, other times you just want to have a quick jolt. however, many bites of one thing that has many layers of flavors doesn’t get boring.

Posted on December 21, 2007 7:23 PM by Violet Yume

I love the comparison between length and narrative style of documentaries and the size and presentation of culinary delights. It makes me think though that the change resides in the type of initial commitment that we make—as viewers or as eaters: tapas bars are popular because you need not make a reservation, you may eat a little or a lot, and you may avoid spending too much without seeming cheap. That said, how often does an “I’ll stop by” turn into a delightful accumulation of dishes, and hours of chatting. In the same way, I never would have tuned into Nimrod Nation had it been a 6-hour long film to which I’d have had to commit an entire weekend afternoon. We are too busy to commit, but not too busy to stop by…. yet somehow human nature continues to love to linger, we just don’t like to plan it anymore… and it’s not just documentary film anymore… I remember going to see Ghandi and Malcolm X … are long films like that made anymore? on the other hand, would a six-hour film on the Upper Peninsula have been released in theatres ten-years ago? Final note - your blog nurtures a comment made by a friend who works at the NY State Council for the Arts, “art is going on strong”, and maybe it’s the bite-size portions that make it more accessible. Thanks!

Posted on December 26, 2007 2:20 PM by A a

I also liked the comparison between food trends and film. Hmmm, provocative questions raised indeed. I hate to sound pessimistic but could this recent trend perhaps just be the commodification of “the family style meal”, deployed to gain a leg up in a competitive market?

and to Angela, I second your enthusiasm for Koyaanisqatsi, it’s an amazing film.

Posted on December 30, 2007 8:39 PM by Kevin D'Abramo

lovely and thought provoking concepts presented in this article. What I walk away with ultimately is that consumerism is consumerism; with regard to food - literally and monetarily - and with regard to film. so how you choose to digest what’s put before you really boils down to a matter of perspective and personal taste. some prefer smaller bites, and others would rather not even chew before they swallow. if you’re served up appetizers, you have the option of creating a meal out of those individual servings, or enjoying them as separate courses. either way, what lands in the pit of your stomach is the same. just as people learn differently and walk differently,and chew differently, they digest information differently. so i say eat the way you live, and create and live the way you eat!

Posted on January 2, 2008 11:25 AM by Quisha Saunders

great post!!! who connects food & film?#@% i agree with kasmore’s technology explanation and the comments, though also wonder if it has something to do with documentary filmmakers moving towards greater transparency, making their final product reflect more closely the way it was filmed…. episodically, over a bunch of visits to the upper Michigan peninsula, or wherever the subjects may be, not taking place in one big arc, but lots of little ups and down and false endings over a longer span of time. kind of like life. kind of like the sopranos. also A LOT easier to edit and assemble ;) even if it lacks the big she-bang of one perfectly constructed 2-hour viewing experience….

Posted on January 4, 2008 11:44 AM by Elena Schneider

Nice post, Kasmore. I think you’re spot on with your comparison of cuisine, cinema and music. After all, they’re each a major tentacle of the squid we call “culture” are they not? IMHO, your observations pretty much correlate to McLuhan’s. The mode of communicating these arts has changed and our current form of interaction with them simply mirrors that development.

As the Times article you linked mentioned, the entree itself hasn’t been around that long. Most of the conventions we have today concerning multi-course eating arose shortly after the 1400s; the same with classical music, literature and visual art. How many people these days listen to a complete symphony (say Mahler’s 3rd) or sit for a painted portrait they had commissioned? Roughly the same amount that sit through a multi-course meal, I’d guess.

Maybe it’s not just a development of the medium, it’s a development of the cognitive processes in the people making, as well as consuming, the media; a shift in the thought patterns of humanity in general since roughly the start of the 20th century. Never mind the fact that the volume of cultural information has increased so much that it is practically impossible to try to grasp the bigger picture without splitting one’s attention to a greater degree. It’s a necessity for engaging with one’s environment these days.

As we move along history’s circle back to a non-linear, oral culture I think we can expect VodCasts and the like to dominate the landscape but I don’t believe what you call “main course” structured narratives will end. There will always be a place for it even though it may be relegated to small pockets of persistence. You might have to dig a little deeper or cast a wider net to get to it but until hairless apes figure out how to get time running backwards, or even sideways, there will continue to be a need for narrative at some level. Those of us that have learned the payoff of that “unique pleasure in giving yourself to the richness of a hearty and complex creation” (great line, that) will still get the opportunity to do so.

Posted on January 29, 2008 5:07 PM by S K

Share Your Thoughts

Please log in to leave a comment.

read the latest | read the archives

our bloggers

Katy Chevigny
position: Executive Director
one thing to know about me: I am a native New Yorker but I did live in Chicago for seven years.
read posts by Katy


Enrico Cullen
position: Director, Development & External Affairs
one thing to know about me: I've never broken a bone.
read posts by Enrico


Beth Davenport
position: Producer
one thing to know about me: I am remarkably good at impersonating tall people.
read posts by Beth


Felix Endara
position: Filmmaker Services Coordinator
one thing to know about me: If I were a sandwich, I'd be a BLT because of the infinite ways it can be customized.
read posts by Felix


Jennifer Gallardo
position: Director of Technology & Online Programs
one thing to know about me: I get stir crazy if I go too long without adequate sleep or chocolate.
read posts by Jennifer



Mary Myers
position: Associate, Development & External Affairs
one thing to know about me: I was conceived on an aircraft carrier.
read posts by Mary


Laimah Osman
position: Web Developer
one thing to know about me: The best pictures of me are the ones that I have taken myself.
read posts by Laimah


Jolene Pinder
position: Associate Producer
one thing to know about me: I keep a small library of songs that incorporate my name. I wish I could claim a personal connection to at least one of 'em.
read posts by Jolene


Intern Team
position: Intern
one thing to know about us: We run the show.
read posts by the interns


Kasmore Rhedrick
position: Web Editor
one thing to know about me: I have a knack for falling asleep in odd places.
read posts by Kasmore


Angela Tucker
position: Director of Production
one thing to know about me: I was named after Angela Davis. She and I have three key things in common: We are both African-American, six feet tall, and have big hair.
read posts by Angela


browse archives